A Study to Assess Knowledge regarding Monkeypox among People residing in selected rural areas of Pathanamthitta District with a View to Develop an Information Booklet
Shruti M. Roy1, Junia Joseph1, Abitha Valsaraj2, Achsah C Joseph2, Aiswarya Sukumar2,
Aleena Ann Abraham2, Aleena Binoy2, Alen Catherin Austin2
1Assistant Professor, (Lecturer), College of Nursing Guru Education Trust, Thiruvalla.
2Nursing Students, College of Nursing Guru Education Trust, Thiruvalla.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: shrutimangalathu91@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Monkeypox is a infectious disease that is caused by the monkeypox virus. Symptoms include painful rash, enlarged lymph nodes and fever. The natural reservoir of the Monkeypox virus is unknown- small mammals such as squirrels and monkeys are susceptible. Therefore, A descriptive study was conducted to evaluate the knowledge regarding Monkeypox among people residing in the selected rural areas of Pathanamthitta district with a view to develop an information booklet. Forty people residing in the Kuttapuzha selected by non-probability purposive sampling. Baseline variables and knowledge level of monkeypox were assessed using baseline proforma with a structured knowledge questionnaire on monkeypox. The data was Analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Knowledge regarding monkeypox among people residing in rural areas were assessed using frequency and percentage. Chi-square test was used to assess the association between knowledge score and selected baseline variables. The study findings revealed that 42% has poor knowledge, 32% has average knowledge, 18% has good knowledge, 8% has very good knowledge.
KEYWORDS: Monkeypox, Pathanamthitta, Information Booklet.
INTRODUCTION:
“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”
Benjamin Franklin Monkeypox is a viral zoonotic disease which is primarily seen in tropical rainforest major areas of central and West Africa. Monkeypox is a member this following family: Poxviridae, subfamily: chordopoxvirinae, genus: orthopoxviral, and species: monkeypox virus.
Historically, from 1958 to 1964 monkeypox virus were detected in monkeys in European countries such as Denmark, Netherlands and United States1. Mpox, commonly called as monkeypox is an infectious viral disease that is seen in humans and some animals2. Symptoms include a rash that forms blisters and then crusts, fever and swollen lymph nodes. The incubation period ranges from five to twenty-one days and symptoms typically last from two to four weeks. Commonly seen in children, pregnant women and people with suppressed immune systems3.
The variola virus, the causative agent of smallpox, is also a part of this genus. transmission can take place through direct contact with droplets of infected person, infected skin or body fluids and sexual contact infected animals by handling infected meat or via bites or scratches. People remain infectious from the time of onset of symptoms till all the lesions have scabbed and healed. Diagnosis can be made by confirmed PCR testing4.
The initial cluster of cases was found in the United Kingdom, where the first case was detected in London on 6 May 2022 in a patient with a travel history from Nigeria, where the disease is endemic. On 16 May, the UK Health Security Agency confirmed four new cases with no link to travel to a country where mpox is endemic and all four cases appeared to have been infected in London. From 18 May 2022 until May 2023, many cases were reported from several countries, predominantly in Europe, Americas, Asia and Africa5. On 23 July 2022, the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, declared the outbreak a public health emergency of international concern. On 17 November 2023, there have been a total of 91,973 confirmed cases in over 113 countries6.
The first case was reported in India on July 14, 2022, in Kerala, and subsequent reporting of cases within intervals of 1–2 days in Delhi and Kerala primarily. Many of them had a history of international travel within last 21 days, and while majority affected were men, only two of them were women, aged 31 and 22 years. One mortality has been reported till date, that of a 22-year-old male, who had been residing in United Arab Emirates, and a contact of a confirmed case of monkeypox, had returned to his hometown in Kerala after getting tested in UAE itself. He died of a known complication of the disease, i.e., encephalitis4. In India, there has been progressive rise in the cases in various parts of India. There were 10 cases in India as reported till August 13th 2022 with 30 % cases (3/10) who do not have history of travel or close contact with each other. The States of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Telangana also reported numerous suspected cases, however the only states with lab-confirmed monkeypox cases are Delhi and Kerala7.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM:
A study to assess the knowledge regarding monkey pox among people residing in selected rural areas of Pathanamthitta district with a view to develop an information booklet.
OBJECTIVES:
1. To assess the knowledge regarding monkey pox among people residing in selected rural areas of Pathanamthitta.
2. To find out the association between the knowledge regarding monkey pox with selected socio demographic variables.
3. To develop an information booklet on monkeypox
HYPOTHESIS:
H1: There will be significant association between knowledge and selected socio demographic variables regarding monkeypox.
METHODOLOGY:
The Non –experimental descriptive study design is used for this study. Pilot study is a trial, small scale study carried out before final research30. The investigators conducted the pilot study in people residing in the selected rural areas of Pathanamthitta district. Pilot study was conducted on 2-11-2023 The purpose of the pilot study was to assess the feasibility of the study, appropriateness of the tool and decide the plan for statistical analysis. The data collection procedure was conducted on 9-11-2023. The sample was collected using convenience sampling technique from Kuttapuzha. Permission was obtained from the community setting and consent taken from the rural people Structured questionnaire used to identify the knowledge regarding monkeypox
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
Description of socio demographic variables:
Table 1: Frequency and Percentage distribution of subject according to their age. n =40
|
Socio demographic variables |
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
AGE |
|
|
|
21-40 |
12 |
30% |
|
41-60 |
8 |
20% |
|
61-80 |
10 |
35% |
|
81-100 |
7 |
15% |
|
TOTAL |
40 |
100% |
Figure 1: Distribution of subject according to their ages.
Table 1 and figure 1 shows that the distribution of subjects with regards to their age. It revealed that 7 (15%) were of age 81-100 years, 8 (20%) were of age 41-60 years, 10 (35%) was of age 61-80 years and remaining 12 (30%) were of age 21-40 years.
Table 2: Frequency and percentage distribution of subject according to gender. n =40
|
Socio Demographic variables |
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
Gender |
|
|
|
Female |
22 |
55% |
|
Male |
18 |
45% |
|
Total |
40 |
100% |
Figure 2: Distribution of subject according to their gender.
Table 2 and figure 2 showed the distribution of subject with regards to their gender. It revealed that 18 (45%) were males and 22 (55%) were females.
Table 3: Frequency and percentage distribution of subject according to education.
|
Variables |
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
Primary |
16 |
40% |
|
Higher secondary |
9 |
22% |
|
Degree |
8 |
20% |
|
Post graduate |
7 |
18% |
|
Total |
40 |
100% |
n=40
Figure 3: Distribution of subject according to their education
Table 3 and figure 3 shows distribution of subjects with regard to their education. It revealed that 7(18%) were post graduate, 8(20%) were degree, 9(22%) were higher secondary and 16 (40%) were primary.
Table 4: Frequency and percentage distribution of subjects according to marital status. n =40
|
Variables |
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
Married |
24 |
60% |
|
Unmarried |
10 |
25.00% |
|
Widow and divorced |
6 |
15.00% |
|
Total |
40 |
100% |
Figure 4: Distribution of subject according to their marital status
Table 4 and figure 4 shows distribution of subject with regard to marital status. It revealed that 6 (15%) were widow and divorced,10 (25%) were unmarried and 24 (60%) were married.
Table 5: Frequency and percentage distribution of subject according to type of family
|
Variables |
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
Nuclear |
26 |
65% |
|
Joint and extended |
14 |
35% |
|
Total |
40 |
100% |
n=40
Figure 5:Distribution of subject according to their type of family
Table 5 and figure 5 show that distribution of the subject with regard to their type of family. It revealed that 14 (35%) were joint and extended family and 26 (65%) were nuclear family.
Table 6: Frequency and percentage distribution of subjects according to occupation n =40
|
Variables |
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
Government employee |
14 |
35% |
|
Self employee |
15 |
38% |
|
House wife |
11 |
27% |
|
Total |
40 |
100% |
Figure 6: Distribution of subject according to their occupation
Table 6 and figure 6 shows distribution of subjects with regard to their occupation. It revealed that 11(28%) were housewife, 14(35%) were Self employee and 15(38%) were Government-employee.
Table 7: Frequency and percentage distribution of subjects according to yearly income n =40
|
Variables |
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
20000-50000 per year |
19 |
48% |
|
Above 50000 per year |
21 |
52% |
|
Total |
40 |
100% |
Figure 7: Distribution of subject according to their yearly income
Table 7 and figure 7 shows distribution of subjects with regard to their yearly income. It revealed that 19 (48%) were earning income between 20000 and 50000 per year and 21 (52%) were earning income above 50000 per year.
Table 8: Frequency and percentage distribution of subjects according to their previous knowledge about monkeypox
|
Variables |
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
Yes |
17 |
42% |
|
No |
23 |
58% |
|
Total |
40 |
100% |
n =40
Figure 8: Distribution of subject according to their previous knowledge
Table 8 and figure 8 shows distribution of subjects with regard to their previous knowledge about monkeypox. It revealed that 17(42%) were have no knowledge about monkeypox and 23(58%) were have previous knowledge about monkeypox.
SECTION – II
Analysis of Knowledge Level of People Regarding Managemet and Prevention of Monkey Pox:
This section deals with the analysis of knowledge level of people regarding management and preventive measures of monkey pox. In order to find out the level of knowledge, a structured questionnaire is used to interpret the level of knowledge. The score was distributed as follows:
0-5 (0-25%) : Poor Knowledge
6-10 (26-50%) : Average Knowledge
11-15 (51-75%) : Good Knowledge
16-20 (76-100%) : Very Good Knowledge
Table 9 : Analysis of knowledge level of people regarding monkeypox n =40
|
Level of knowledge |
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
Poor |
17 |
42% |
|
Average |
13 |
32% |
|
Good |
7 |
18% |
|
Verygood |
3 |
8% |
|
Total |
40 |
100% |
Figure 11: Analysis of knowledge level of people regarding monkeypox
Table 10 and figure 11 shows distribution of subjects according to level of knowledge about monkey pox. It revealed that 3(8%) were have very good knowledge, 7(18%) were have good knowledge, 13(32%) were have average knowledge and 17(42%) were have poor knowledge about monkey pox.
SECTION Ⅲ:
Association between Knowledge of People and Selected Socio Demographic Variables
Table: 11 Association between knowledge of people and selected socio demographic variables
|
Socio demographic variables |
Level of knowledge |
Df |
Table value |
P value |
Chi Square |
Inference |
||||
|
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Very good |
|||||||
|
Age In Years |
21-40 |
7 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
9 |
16.92 |
|
17.197 |
S |
|
41-60 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
||||||
|
61-80 |
2 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
||||||
|
81-100 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
||||||
|
Gender |
Male |
3 |
10 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
7.82 |
|
9.007 |
S |
|
Female |
14 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
||||||
|
Marital status |
Married |
12 |
7 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
12.59 |
|
13.0926 |
|
|
Unmarried |
1 |
1 |
6 |
2 |
||||||
|
Widow and divorced |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
||||||
|
Type of family |
Nuclear |
10 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
7.82 |
|
3.9984 |
|
|
Joint and extended |
7 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
||||||
|
Education |
Primary |
10 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
9 |
16.92 |
|
18.6263 |
|
|
Higher secondary |
2 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
||||||
|
Degree |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
||||||
|
Post graduate |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
||||||
|
Occupation |
Self emoloyee |
1 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
12.59 |
|
13.693 |
|
|
Government emoloyee |
8 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
||||||
|
House wife |
2 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
||||||
|
Income |
20000-50000 |
2 |
10 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
7.82 |
|
16.8755 |
|
|
Above 50000 |
10 |
2 |
8 |
1 |
||||||
|
Previous knowledge |
Yes |
5 |
10 |
2 |
6 |
3 |
7.82 |
|
9.8307 |
|
|
No |
2 |
3 |
9 |
3 |
||||||
Inferences:
1. There is an association between knowledge regarding monkey pox and age at the level of 0.05.
2. There is an association between knowledge regarding monkey pox and gender at the level of 0.05.
3. There is an association between knowledge regarding monkey pox and education at the level of 0.05.
4. There is an association between knowledge regarding monkey pox and occupation at the level of 0.05.
5. There is an association between knowledge regarding monkey pox and income at the level of 0.05.
6. There is an association between knowledge regarding monkey pox and previous knowledge at the level of 0.05.
CONCLUSION:
The present study, shows that 42% has poor knowledge, 32% has average knowledge, 18% has good knowledge and 8% has very good knowledge. This shows that most of the people residing in rural areas of Pathanamthitta has poor knowledge regarding monkeypox and the study shows a significant association between knowledge regarding monkeypox and selected socio demographic variables.
REFERENCES:
1. Oriol M, Dimie O, Boghuma K T et al. Monkeypox a newly emerged virus. National library of medicine [Internet].2022 [Cited on 2022/11/17]: 60-74. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.in
2. Abdul R A S, Manish D, Asmaa A M et al. multi-Country Monkeypox outbreak in nonendemic countries. National Institute of health [Internet]. 2022 [Cited on 2022/12/07]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.in
3. Espanol: Signs and Symptoms of monkeypox. Centers for disease control & prevention [Internet]. 2023 [Cited on 2023/08/31]: Available from: https://www.cdc.gov.in
4. Edward A B, Allison LN: Smallpox vaccine. National Library of Medicine [Internet]. 2003 [Cited on 2003/04/01]:87-92 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih government.in
5. 5.Munawar H, Sarah J, Zuhir A et al. The outbreak of monkeypox. National Library of Medicine [Internet]:2022 [Cited on 2022/06/24]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih government.in
6. Netalie G, John R, Jennifer R et al. Global Health Emergency Over monkeypox outbreak. Health Care and Pharmaceuticals [Internet]:2022[Cited on 2022/07/24] Available from: https://www.reuters.com
7. Tanya S, Pritish B, Pankaja R, K H Naveen et al. Monkeypox Current Situation in India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine [Internet]: 2022 [Cited on 2022/12/14]: 628-630 Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nib.gov.in
8. Marlin J M, Balram R, Farah Z et al. Monkeypox statistics. National Library of Medicine [Internet]:2023[Cited on 2023/05/03] Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nib.gov.in
9. Gregory D H, Kristi Y, James S et al. Clinical characteristics of human monkeypox. Infectious diseases society of America [Internet]: 2005 [Cited on 2005/12/15]: 1742-1751 Available from https://academic.oup.com
10. Gemma. H, Tamer. A, Suran G et al. Family cluster of 3 cases of Mpox. Europe Journal of infectious disease epidemiology, prevention and control since 1966 [Internet]:2021 [Cited on 2021/08/12] Available from https://academic.oup.com
11. Alshrani N Z, Alarif A M, Sah R et al. Assessment of knowledge of monkeypox viral infection among the general population in Saudi Arabia, National Library of Medicine [Internet] 2022, [Cited on 2022/08/11] Available from https://academic.oup.com
12. Sudipta D M, Jyoti D, Kaushik M et al. Assessment of knowledge on human monkeypox virus among general population in Begladesh cold spring harbour laboratory [Internet]2022 [Cited on 2022/09/01] Available from httpp://cocow.medrxiv.org
13. Suresh K S Nursing research & statistics, 3rd edition elsevier publication, 2017, page no: 336
14. Suresh. K S Nursing Research & statistics, 3rd edition, page no, 141
15. Sarya S, Hider A, Basher et al. Monkeypox in Syria. National Library of Medicine (Internet).2023 (cited on 2022/04/20); :271-276. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
16. Lin, Galvin Sim Siang et al. Monkeypox awareness knowledge and attitude among undergraduate preclinical and clinical students at a Malaysian Dental School, Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine (Internet).2022 (cited on 2022/10/04); 461-467. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net
17. Najim Z A, Sayan M, Ali A et al. medical students’ perception regarding the Re-emerging Monkeypox virus. National Library of Medicine (Internet).2022. (cited on 2022/08/14). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
18. Mohammad AL, Sudeen Z E et al. Knowledge of Medical Students in Jordan regarding Monkeypox outbreak. Research Gate (Internet).2023(cited in 2023/02/01). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net
19. Assem G, Samer A et al. Knowledge of Monkeypox among Medical Students in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Research Gate (Internet)2023(cited on 2023/04/10) Available from: https://www.researchgate.net
20. Harapan, Abdul M, Samsul et al. Knowledge of Human Monkeypox viral Infection among General Practitioners: A cross-sectional study in Indonesia. National Library of Medicine (Internet)2020(cited on 2020/03/23) Available from: https://www.researchgate.net
21. Mehedi Hasan. Monkeypox and preparedness of Bangladesh: A knowledge and attitude assessment study among Medical Doctors. National Library of Medicine (Internet)2023(cited on 2023/01/05) Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
22. Ahammed I, Zaharadeen S B et al. A Cross-sectional Survey of Public Knowledge of the Monkeypox Disease in Nigeria. BMC Public Health (Internet)2023. (cited on 2023/03/07) Available from: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com
23. Grazia M G, Lucio F et al. Knowledge and attitudes of healthcare workers about Monkeypox virus infection in Southern Italy. National Library of Medicine (Internet)2023(cited on 2023/02/27). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
24. Benjamin R. B, Mario J.G. Knowledge, attitude and practices towards Monkeypox during the 2022 outbreak: An online cross-sectional survey among clinicians in Ohio, USA. Journal of Infection and Public Health (Internet)2022(cited on 2022/12/12). Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com
25. Sirwan K.A, Salar O.A et al. Knowledge, attitude and worry in Kurdistan region of Iraq during the Monkeypox outbreak in 2022. National Library of Medicine (Internet)2023(cited on 2023/03/08) Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
26. Kumar N, Ahammed F, Raza M.S et al. Monkeypox Cross-sectional survey of knowledge, attitudes, practices and willingness to vaccinate among university students in Pakistan. National Library of Medicine (Internet)2022(cited on 2022/12/31) Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
27. Joseph B, Sherin G et al. Perception of Indian Healthcare Practitioners Regarding the 2022 Outbreak of Monkeypox Disease. National Library of Medicine (Internet)2023(cited on 2023/02/15) Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
28. Nirmala V, T Silvia edition Sunil M S “Research methodology in Nursing 1st edition, Jaypee publication, 2011 page no, 206
29. Sreevani Rentala basics in Nursing Research &Statistics, 1st edition Jaypee publication,2019, (Research approach)
30. Suresh K S, Nursing research &statistics, 2nd edition india elsevier publication 2014 (setting of the study).
|
Received on 27.11.2024 Revised on 11.02.2025 Accepted on 16.04.2025 Published on 22.05.2025 Available online from May 24, 2025 A and V Pub J. of Nursing and Medical Res. 2025;4(2):37-42. DOI: 10.52711/jnmr.2025.10 ©A and V Publications All right reserved
|
|
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License. |
|